Review




Structured Review

Charles River Laboratories primary chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs)
Primary Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (Cefs), supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/primary chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs)/product/Charles River Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

97
ATCC cell lines chick embryo fibroblasts cef
Cell Lines Chick Embryo Fibroblasts Cef, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cell lines chick embryo fibroblasts cef/product/ATCC
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell lines chick embryo fibroblasts cef - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Charles River Laboratories primary chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs)
Primary Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (Cefs), supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/primary chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs)/product/Charles River Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Charles River Laboratories fresh chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs)
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (Cefs), supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fresh chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs)/product/Charles River Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fresh chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Charles River Laboratories fresh chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (Cefs, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fresh chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs/product/Charles River Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fresh chick embryo fibroblasts (cefs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Charles River Laboratories chick embryo fibroblasts (cef)
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (Cef), supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chick embryo fibroblasts (cef)/product/Charles River Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chick embryo fibroblasts (cef) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Charles River Laboratories chick embryo fibroblasts cef
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Chick Embryo Fibroblasts Cef, supplied by Charles River Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chick embryo fibroblasts cef/product/Charles River Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chick embryo fibroblasts cef - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Pfizer Inc cef (chick embryo fibroblast) cells
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Cef (Chick Embryo Fibroblast) Cells, supplied by Pfizer Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cef (chick embryo fibroblast) cells/product/Pfizer Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cef (chick embryo fibroblast) cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Fort Dodge Animal Health hvt strain fc126, second chick embryo fibroblast (cef) passage stock from commercial hvt vaccine
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Hvt Strain Fc126, Second Chick Embryo Fibroblast (Cef) Passage Stock From Commercial Hvt Vaccine, supplied by Fort Dodge Animal Health, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hvt strain fc126, second chick embryo fibroblast (cef) passage stock from commercial hvt vaccine/product/Fort Dodge Animal Health
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hvt strain fc126, second chick embryo fibroblast (cef) passage stock from commercial hvt vaccine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Intervet International GmbH chick embryo fibroblast (cef) cells
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Chick Embryo Fibroblast (Cef) Cells, supplied by Intervet International GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chick embryo fibroblast (cef) cells/product/Intervet International GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
chick embryo fibroblast (cef) cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Spafas Inc primary chick embryo fibroblast (cef) cells
rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of <t>CEFs</t> infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48
Primary Chick Embryo Fibroblast (Cef) Cells, supplied by Spafas Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/primary chick embryo fibroblast (cef) cells/product/Spafas Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primary chick embryo fibroblast (cef) cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of CEFs infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: Time- and cost-effective production of untagged recombinant MVA by flow virometry and direct virus sorting

doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04353-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: rMVA- M1-V5 production by cytometry-based RGGSM. A infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Green fluorescent cells were sorted from the POS-SW, yielding a mixed “green + red” cell population (inset). B An enriched green fluorescent population (inset) were obtained by a second round of Cell-Sorting, from which, after F/T/S, green virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 8/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.19 ffu/culture, with a 13:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C Flow cytometry of CEFs infected with virus isolated from a green clone. Untagged rMVA-infected cells were sorted from a double-negative NEG-SW. Finally, after F/T/S, untagged virus clones were isolated by TD. In this experiment, approximately 5000 events were sorted and 6/48 "green" microculture were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.12 ffu/culture, with a 16:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. D M1-specific PCR confirmed the presence of the M1 transgene in both green HAG-tagged (lane 1) and untagged clones (lanes 2 to 4) as in the TP-HAG- M1-V5 construct, which served as a positive control (PC), but unlike in a sample from MVA-77-RED-infected CEFs, which served as a negative control (NC). E HA-specific WB confirmed the presence of the HAG fusion gene in the control green isolate (lane 1) and its absence in untagged clones (lanes 2 to 4). CEFs infected with rMVA-SHAG (see Methods) served as a positive control (PC HA). The V5-specific WB confirms the presence of the M1-V5 protein in all isolates (lanes 1 to 4). CEFs infected with rMVA-Rome- M1-V5 (see Methods) served as a positive control for the presence of the M1-V5 transgene (PC M1-V5). Non-infected CEFs and MVA-77-RED-infected CEFs served as negative controls (NC1 and NC2, respectively)

Article Snippet: Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (CEFs) were prepared from 11-day old embryonated Specific Pathogen Free chicken eggs (Charles River, Paris, France) and maintained in a serum-free medium containing 10 ng/mL EGF (VP-SFM, GIBCO), supplemented with 2% glutamine and 1% Pen/Strep, as previously described [ , ].

Techniques: Cytometry, Infection, Transfection, FACS, Virus, Clone Assay, Isolation, Flow Cytometry, Construct, Positive Control, Negative Control, Control

A membrane bound marker for RGGSM is expressed at the cell surface. A EGFP-expressing rMVA-77-G-M1-V5-infected CEFs show a “cytoplasmic green” signal B rMVA-77-SHAG-infected CEFs show a

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: Time- and cost-effective production of untagged recombinant MVA by flow virometry and direct virus sorting

doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04353-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A membrane bound marker for RGGSM is expressed at the cell surface. A EGFP-expressing rMVA-77-G-M1-V5-infected CEFs show a “cytoplasmic green” signal B rMVA-77-SHAG-infected CEFs show a "stable green" signal displayed also at the cell surface and on actin projections mainly as membrane vesicles. Actin was labeled in red by phalloidin-TRITC. Transgene cassettes schemes below the micrographs are detailed in Fig.

Article Snippet: Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (CEFs) were prepared from 11-day old embryonated Specific Pathogen Free chicken eggs (Charles River, Paris, France) and maintained in a serum-free medium containing 10 ng/mL EGF (VP-SFM, GIBCO), supplemented with 2% glutamine and 1% Pen/Strep, as previously described [ , ].

Techniques: Membrane, Marker, Expressing, Infection, Labeling

Substantial release of virions in supernatants of MVA-infected cells. Supernatants from rMVA-77-SHAG- infected CEFs were harvested at various time points upon infection. Viral titers (ffu/ml, blue curve) and lysis-released cellular dsDNA (ng/ml, red curve) were determined; titer and DNA values are averages ± SD of 3 replicas. Excel log trend and equation for the first part of the viral titer curve are shown. Photographic inserts show cell morphology at 10, 30 and 70 h p.i

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: Time- and cost-effective production of untagged recombinant MVA by flow virometry and direct virus sorting

doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04353-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: Substantial release of virions in supernatants of MVA-infected cells. Supernatants from rMVA-77-SHAG- infected CEFs were harvested at various time points upon infection. Viral titers (ffu/ml, blue curve) and lysis-released cellular dsDNA (ng/ml, red curve) were determined; titer and DNA values are averages ± SD of 3 replicas. Excel log trend and equation for the first part of the viral titer curve are shown. Photographic inserts show cell morphology at 10, 30 and 70 h p.i

Article Snippet: Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (CEFs) were prepared from 11-day old embryonated Specific Pathogen Free chicken eggs (Charles River, Paris, France) and maintained in a serum-free medium containing 10 ng/mL EGF (VP-SFM, GIBCO), supplemented with 2% glutamine and 1% Pen/Strep, as previously described [ , ].

Techniques: Infection, Lysis

Visualization of fluorescent EEVs by Flow Virometry analysis. A Physical, FSC vs. Violet SSC plot (left panel), and fluorescence, B525/40 (green) vs. Violet SSC plot (right panel), characterisation of Megamix beads (900 nm—red, 500 nm—blue, 300 nm—yellow and 100 nm—green dots) by BC CytoFLEX S analysis, setting the instrument for flow virometry. B CEFs were infected with either rMVA-77-SHAG or rMVA-77-G- M1-V5, and supernatants were harvested 30 h p.i. Supernatants were analysed with the settings established using the Megamix beads (B525/40 vs. Violet SSC), revealing signals for entities with the “stable green” surface marker (SHAG-EEVs, left panel), but not so for the “cytoplasmic green” marker (G-EEVs, middle panel), unless these entities were stained in the DNA with the SYTO 13 dye (G-EEVs + SYTO 13, right panel). C and D BC CytoFLEX S analysis with B 525/40 (green) versus R 660/20 (red) settings of SHAG-EEVs. The green fluorescence is progressively lost with sample dilution. E) F/T/S treatment of SHAG EEVs abolishes the green signal, confirming its membrane localization

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: Time- and cost-effective production of untagged recombinant MVA by flow virometry and direct virus sorting

doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04353-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: Visualization of fluorescent EEVs by Flow Virometry analysis. A Physical, FSC vs. Violet SSC plot (left panel), and fluorescence, B525/40 (green) vs. Violet SSC plot (right panel), characterisation of Megamix beads (900 nm—red, 500 nm—blue, 300 nm—yellow and 100 nm—green dots) by BC CytoFLEX S analysis, setting the instrument for flow virometry. B CEFs were infected with either rMVA-77-SHAG or rMVA-77-G- M1-V5, and supernatants were harvested 30 h p.i. Supernatants were analysed with the settings established using the Megamix beads (B525/40 vs. Violet SSC), revealing signals for entities with the “stable green” surface marker (SHAG-EEVs, left panel), but not so for the “cytoplasmic green” marker (G-EEVs, middle panel), unless these entities were stained in the DNA with the SYTO 13 dye (G-EEVs + SYTO 13, right panel). C and D BC CytoFLEX S analysis with B 525/40 (green) versus R 660/20 (red) settings of SHAG-EEVs. The green fluorescence is progressively lost with sample dilution. E) F/T/S treatment of SHAG EEVs abolishes the green signal, confirming its membrane localization

Article Snippet: Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (CEFs) were prepared from 11-day old embryonated Specific Pathogen Free chicken eggs (Charles River, Paris, France) and maintained in a serum-free medium containing 10 ng/mL EGF (VP-SFM, GIBCO), supplemented with 2% glutamine and 1% Pen/Strep, as previously described [ , ].

Techniques: Fluorescence, Infection, Marker, Staining, Membrane

Flow Virometry sorting of green fluorescent rMVA virions. A Supernatants at 30 h p.i. of rMVA-77-SHAG- or rMVA-77-RED- infected CEFs (SHAG-EEVs and RED-EEVs) were first analysed on BD FACSAria Fusion, based on their physical characteristics (FSC vs. SSC plot, left panel) and a sorting window (rectangle) was chosen such as to exclude larger particles including cells. Next, entities selected from that sorting window were sorted based on green fluorescence (B530/30 vs. SSC plot, middle panel). NEG-SW and POS-SW were then set for further analysis. The POS-SW was defined such that there were no RED-EEVs detectable for that window (right panel). B The two sorted populations from the NEG-SW and POS-SW were re-analyzed by BC CytoFLEX S based on physical characteristics (Violet-SSC) and green fluorescence (B525/40), confirming the enrichment of green fluorescent entities (reflecting the presence of SHAG-EEVs) from the POS-SW, as compared to those from the NEG-SW

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: Time- and cost-effective production of untagged recombinant MVA by flow virometry and direct virus sorting

doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04353-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: Flow Virometry sorting of green fluorescent rMVA virions. A Supernatants at 30 h p.i. of rMVA-77-SHAG- or rMVA-77-RED- infected CEFs (SHAG-EEVs and RED-EEVs) were first analysed on BD FACSAria Fusion, based on their physical characteristics (FSC vs. SSC plot, left panel) and a sorting window (rectangle) was chosen such as to exclude larger particles including cells. Next, entities selected from that sorting window were sorted based on green fluorescence (B530/30 vs. SSC plot, middle panel). NEG-SW and POS-SW were then set for further analysis. The POS-SW was defined such that there were no RED-EEVs detectable for that window (right panel). B The two sorted populations from the NEG-SW and POS-SW were re-analyzed by BC CytoFLEX S based on physical characteristics (Violet-SSC) and green fluorescence (B525/40), confirming the enrichment of green fluorescent entities (reflecting the presence of SHAG-EEVs) from the POS-SW, as compared to those from the NEG-SW

Article Snippet: Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (CEFs) were prepared from 11-day old embryonated Specific Pathogen Free chicken eggs (Charles River, Paris, France) and maintained in a serum-free medium containing 10 ng/mL EGF (VP-SFM, GIBCO), supplemented with 2% glutamine and 1% Pen/Strep, as previously described [ , ].

Techniques: Infection, Fluorescence

Untagged rMVA-M1-V5 production by virometry-based RGGSM. A Infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Supernatants at 30 h were directly subjected to Virus-Sorting (BD FACSAria Fusion) based on green fluorescence and physical characteristics (B530/30 vs. SSC). Candidate rMVAs, HAG-M1-V5-EEVs were sorted in bulk from the POS-SW as defined in Fig. A, F/T/S-treated and subjected to TD. In this experiment, approximately 3500 events were sorted and 10/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.18 ffu/culture, with a 7:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C The supernatant at 30 h of one green fluorescent TD-clone was subjected to Virus-Sorting as in (A). Non fluorescent events (containing the candidate untagged rMVA EEVs) were sorted in bulk from the NEG-SW, as defined in Fig. A, F/T/S-treated and subjected to TD. In this particular experiment, approximately 2000 non-fluorescent events were sorted in bulk and 7/48 non-fluorescent virus infected cultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.17 ffu/culture, with a 14:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. PCR ( C ) and WB analysis ( D ) of infected cell lysates (as in Fig. D & E) confirmed that all four clones indeed expressed the M1-V5 transgene. Abbreviations: PC (positive control = rMVA-M1-V5-Rome-infected CEFs) (see Methods), NC1 (negative control = non-infected CEFs), NC2 (negative control = MVA-77-RED-infected CEFs)

Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

Article Title: Time- and cost-effective production of untagged recombinant MVA by flow virometry and direct virus sorting

doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04353-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: Untagged rMVA-M1-V5 production by virometry-based RGGSM. A Infection/transfection of CEF cells with MVA-77-RED and TP-HAG- M1-V5 DNA. Supernatants at 30 h were directly subjected to Virus-Sorting (BD FACSAria Fusion) based on green fluorescence and physical characteristics (B530/30 vs. SSC). Candidate rMVAs, HAG-M1-V5-EEVs were sorted in bulk from the POS-SW as defined in Fig. A, F/T/S-treated and subjected to TD. In this experiment, approximately 3500 events were sorted and 10/48 “green” microcultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.18 ffu/culture, with a 7:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. C The supernatant at 30 h of one green fluorescent TD-clone was subjected to Virus-Sorting as in (A). Non fluorescent events (containing the candidate untagged rMVA EEVs) were sorted in bulk from the NEG-SW, as defined in Fig. A, F/T/S-treated and subjected to TD. In this particular experiment, approximately 2000 non-fluorescent events were sorted in bulk and 7/48 non-fluorescent virus infected cultures were obtained at TD, which corresponds to 0.17 ffu/culture, with a 14:1 ratio of single to multiple infections. PCR ( C ) and WB analysis ( D ) of infected cell lysates (as in Fig. D & E) confirmed that all four clones indeed expressed the M1-V5 transgene. Abbreviations: PC (positive control = rMVA-M1-V5-Rome-infected CEFs) (see Methods), NC1 (negative control = non-infected CEFs), NC2 (negative control = MVA-77-RED-infected CEFs)

Article Snippet: Fresh Chick Embryo Fibroblasts (CEFs) were prepared from 11-day old embryonated Specific Pathogen Free chicken eggs (Charles River, Paris, France) and maintained in a serum-free medium containing 10 ng/mL EGF (VP-SFM, GIBCO), supplemented with 2% glutamine and 1% Pen/Strep, as previously described [ , ].

Techniques: Infection, Transfection, Virus, Fluorescence, Clone Assay, Positive Control, Negative Control